Accessibility in India – mainstreaming issues

I had the privilege of going to a conference on accessibility in education. As some of you know, I have been involved in a project with universities for many years (Liberated Learning - -www.liberatedlearning.com) This is a consortium of some 20 universities worldwide, that are trying to make classrooms more accessible for deaf and hard of hearing students (and others), using speech recognition to caption lectures. I envisioned perhaps engaging an Indian university to join the consortium, and open up mainstream education for deaf and hard of hearing students.

Reality check. Someone involved in deaf sign language in India gave a presentation. He pointed out that deaf children in India don’t start learning sign until age 7, which leaves them pretty “non-lingual” until then. And seven years old is too late to start learning your first language. The kids end up reading on a 2nd grade level, and generally don’t graduate high school. I imagine that there are virtually no deaf students in college, then. This dilutes a key “selling point” for Liberated Learning….there is no value in captioning lectures for deaf/hard of hearing students if:
  1. they aren’t getting into college anyway
  2. they have 2nd grade reading skills

Discussions with another accessibility expert at the conference exposed more attitudes towards disabilities and treatment of people with disabilities in India. She said that the Hindu belief in reincarnation and karma reduces the urgency people feel to remediate and intervene for children with disabilities; it introduces a belief that the disability is the person’s “cross to bear” (to mix religious metaphors!). There is also a Hindu mandate to help needy people, but that (she said) translates more into “protecting them from outside forces” rather than introducing extensive interventions. So it looks like a long road to hoe if the goal is to mainstream children with disabilities. There is a need to change the attitudes; not only to introduce new methods and technologies.

3 comments:

  1. Hi Sara,

    The fact that deaf children don't start learning sign language until the age of 7 is very confusing to me. Maybe this is my US bias showing through but I don't see how a child can go for 7 years without communicating at all. It seems like the children and their parents or caregivers would "ad lib" and develop their own version of sign language in order to communicate.

    Andi

    ReplyDelete
  2. hi Andi - - yes, you are probably right. The speaker probably meant that they don't learn "formal" sign language till 7; there is probably ad hoc signing going on before that. I don't know what impact that has linguistically; whether home-grown signing "counts" as formal language acquisition, or whether the signing is still primitive and leaves these kids at a linguistic disadvantave even when they start learning "official" sign language - - Regards! Sara

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dr.Bassons, Thank you very much for sharing it, I am an Indian, yes, I do feel the same, I would like to bring some changes in their attitude towards disability, to bridge off their communication gap with others. Anyway, I am taking liberty to share your blog with some of my friends. Thank you again. :)

    ReplyDelete